On July 16, the Students’ Association of the College of Social Sciences posted a notice on the CBNU homepage. It was a criticizing of the Head Office’s project for building the Physical Development Center(the tentative name) On the refutation, there were many other opinions of the Students’ Associations. The problems are still in friction between  the Head Office and Students.
The Head Office of Planning and Development conducted a survey of students. In covering this problem, CBT obtained the data from the survey. However, it was untrustworthy. Even though there were statistics arranging the professors’, faculties’ and students’ opinions, it was inaccurate and it’s subjects were unclear. The most doubtful fact is that the document suggests that students partly agree with this idea.
Why did this situation happen? CBT found some errors in the process reflecting student’s opinions. Because the reception date fell in the vacation season, students’ opinions couldn’t be gathered. Moreover, the Head Office declared that they would regard “no response” as an affirmative. Public opinion couldn’t be formed. CBT attempted a telephone interview with the General Student’ Association(GSA) several times to request an explanation, but was rejected. Even when CBT visited the GSA, CBT heard an excuse from a person(who introduced himself as a low level staff member) that he didn’t know the whole memberships’ viewpoints. The GSA couldn’t  organize their internal opinions, and comments from the GSA are different from the Head Office’s opinion. Communication between students and them is required.